There is a particular kind of urgency that shows up in many of our adult relationships.
It doesn’t look dramatic from the outside, but inside it feels like pressure in the chest, a tightening in the throat, or a sudden wave of fear.
It is the felt sense of needing something—a response, a tone of voice, a look, a presence—from another person, and needing it right now.
In IFS, this sensation almost always traces back to an exile.
A young part of us that once reached out for connection, found no one there, and then froze in that moment of aloneness.
What we call “urgency” in the present is often that same child’s terror echoing forward.
This week, in session with a client, this pattern became vivid.
When she turned inward, she saw a little girl trying to talk to her father.
She wanted him to notice her.
She wanted him to understand what she was feeling.
She wanted attunement—nothing more complicated than a parent meeting her emotional world with warmth and interest.
He didn’t.
Not because he didn’t care, but because he did not have the capacity to attune to her inner experience. He could offer structure, routine, and presence in the physical sense, but he could not join her where she actually lived—inside her emotions.
For the child, this wasn’t simply disappointing. It was frightening.
Children do not separate emotional needs from physical ones.
When attunement is missing, the nervous system registers danger.
Her body learned: “If no one understands me, I am not safe.”
That belief settled into her system like a law of nature.
And decades later, in the presence of her partner, it still whispers.
When the exile carries that early pain, she doesn’t come to the surface alone.
Protector parts gather around her, each doing whatever they can to secure the connection she once missed.
In my client’s system, one protector pushes forward with explanations—talking more, talking louder, trying again and again to be understood.
Another protector shows up as irritation, sharpness, or a “sassy” insistence on being seen.
A third pulls away, waiting to see if the other person will come closer.
Each one trying, in its own way, to resurrect a moment of attunement that never happened.
None of these behaviors are pathological.
They are attempts to solve a problem the child still believes is life-or-death.
When an exile grows up without reliable emotional attunement, she continues searching for it in adulthood.
The partner becomes the closest available candidate for that original unmet need.
And because the child part has no sense of time, she assumes that the partner should be able to provide what the parent could not.
When the partner cannot—or does not—attune, the exile reacts as if the old danger has returned.
Protector parts mobilize.
The partner’s protectors mobilize in response.
And suddenly two adults are caught in a cycle neither one created intentionally.
This is why so many of us end up in relationships that repeat childhood dynamics—not because we choose them, but because our nervous systems are still trying to finish an unfinished experience.
At the core, the exile is not asking for reassurance or problem-solving.
She is asking for attunement—someone to be with her in the emotion itself, not above it or around it.
This is the co-regulation children depend on.
When it’s missing, the body continues to reach for it, even decades later.
And because the exile never learned that emotional waves pass naturally, each feeling still carries a sense of danger.
Her urgency is not irrational.
It is developmentally true for the age at which she froze.
This is where the healing direction of IFS becomes clear.
Over time, yes—our own Self can become the primary source of attunement for our exiles.
But it is not an instant shift.
It requires slowing down enough to notice when the exile is activated, and turning toward her with the kind of presence she never received:
“I’m here.
I see exactly what you’re feeling.
You don’t have to work so hard for me to understand you.
You’re not alone in this.”
This kind of internal connection does not erase the value of being met by another person, but it reduces the desperation.
It teaches the exile that attunement is available—even when external conditions are imperfect.
Mine have been quieter, which can sometimes be a sign of peace and sometimes a sign of distance.
When I check in honestly, I can feel one still watching an old relationship, still hoping for a certain kind of recognition that never came.
That tells me she needs more of my own presence—more consistent checking in, more curiosity, more willingness to meet her where she is instead of waiting for her to settle down.
If I expect anyone else to attune to me, I must be willing to model that attunement internally first.
Where are your exiles right now?
Not in theory, but in this moment.
Are they urgent? Are they quiet? Are they testing? Are they reaching?
And more importantly—when they do reach for you internally, do you turn toward them?
Or do you hope someone else will do it for you?
This is not a moral question.
It is simply the doorway to the next phase of healing.
Because the more consistently we can attune to the parts of us that once went unseen,
the less we need others to carry the weight of our unhealed childhoods,
and the more our relationships can become places of genuine connection rather than reenactments of old hunger.
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.